A Friend in Need Is . . . a Client?
Published September 15, 2009
What should you do when an acquaintance needs advice, but obviously can’t pay for the full cost? It’s a difficult question. If you do someone a favor because you see them regularly, for example in a yoga class, and don’t charge for your service, you will ultimately feel resentment (consciously or unconsciously) each time you see that person. And the feeling of resentment is the first step toward the commission of an error and malpractice.
There are really two aspects to analyzing what approach to take. One is that you, as a lawyer, are in business to make a living while helping people with their personal issues. In the practice of law we never forget that we are dealing with human lives. Our goal is to bring a sense of order to troubled situations, communicate honestly and directly about the legal and human difficulties involved, and maintain full confidentiality at all times. It is these services that we as lawyers provide at a reasonable fee, and clients who accept them and pay the fee are entitled to full and responsible representation.
On the other hand, lawyers have a professional obligation to provide legal services, not just to the clients who can pay for them, but to the people who need but cannot afford them. This is the age-old concept of pro bono publico (“for the public good”) describing the services of lawyers who voluntarily contribute part of their time without charge or at substantially reduced rates. However, it is a simple fact that no lawyer can be expected to do this unless that lawyer’s practice generates the profitability that allows devoting the time for pro bono work.
You have to decide which category the friend’s legal issue falls in. If it’s obviously a legal aid issue, do you want to be legal aid on the other side? Do you want to work on the equivalent of a modest means panel? If the decision is that it’s a pro bono matter that you want to undertake, then do it. If the friend has modest means and can pay something, then decide what the charge should be. Review the paperwork and make a choice.
But, if your decision comes down to charging a reduced rate, it is a very good idea to get your money in advance of when you deliver advice. Otherwise the friend/client will exert subtle or overt pressure to ultimately make it a pro bono matter for you and you will become resentful anyway. If you tell them the cost before giving advice, the decision to retain you is then theirs – particularly if you add that you’ve already done your pro bono work for the year, or that you do pro bono only through the organized bar. They will either accept your terms or they will say you’re too expensive for them and move on. Such a resolution probably saves everyone grief and resentment down the road.
Categorized in: Client Relations, Ethics, Management
Audience type: Administrators, Associates, Large Law Firms, Small Law Firms, Sole Practitioners