Are You Indispensible?

Published June 7, 2011

A Mandatory Retirement Age

On Memorial Day it was my privilege to be quoted and pictured in a New York Times article about the difficulties law firms and other organizations have in enforcing a mandatory retirement age. The title, “Easing Out the Gray-Haired. Or Not,” well expresses the dilemma. On the one hand, employers are reluctant to continue carrying (as they see it) older producers who no longer seem to be pulling their own weight. On the other, those individuals often still see themselves as being viable contributors and resent being forced out – to the point of filing lawsuits to stop it.

Large versus Small Law Firm Perspective

As told the reporter, there is a vastly different dynamic for this issue in large versus small law firms. In large law firms every partner targeted for retirement, forced or otherwise, was originally added to the partnership because the firm had a strategic goal for his or her practice. However, when the firm’s overall strategic goal for profitability is not being met, the older partners are asked to go. The days of “professionalism” and “collegiality” are replaced by tough competitive circumstances and high financial expectations. Something has to give.

Large Firm Partner: A Question of Contacts

Partners who refuse to leave quietly can sue to keep their positions, which the article pointed out has happened at large firms like Sidley Austin and Kelley Drye & Warren. My suggestion was more positive and more proactive: staying at your firm is not a question of skill, it’s a question of contacts. “Very few people are so skilled that they can’t be replaced by a younger, more current practitioner,” I noted. “You’ve got to be so connected to important clients that the firm is going to fear your departure.” This doesn’t mean holding firm or clients hostage. A senior rainmaker can play an active role as a service team coordinator, for example, representing the firm to clients and maintaining key contacts while helping direct work to younger lawyers. Senior lawyers remain engaged in the business without fear of financial loss, while firm and clients benefit from a planned transition.

Sole Practitioners Enjoy Fruits of Their Labor

The other side to this issue is the small firm. Every such firm represents an investment of years of hard work and financial resources in growing the practice and building goodwill, which can be sold when the lawyer is ready to retire. Contrast that to the big firm senior partner who is facing an abrupt and painful end to a career. The sole practitioner has definitely built something of value and can be in the position to enjoy the fruits of those labors. The big firm partner that has not proven he or she is indispensible may have no alternative but to sue the firm or accept the transition to his “second season.”

Categorized in:

Audience type: Large Law Firms, Small Law Firms