In 1960, fewer than 40 domestic law firms had 50 or more lawyers. In the latest listing of the 250 largest U.S. firms, even after two years of declines in total employment, no. 250 on the list still employed 160 attorneys.
Many of these firms began practice in a single city or small region before their growth took them to a national level. Such law firms often followed their corporate clients, who for decades have lived by the philosophy that bigger was better.
Large national firms certainly offer their clients many resources and economies on a scale that smaller firms simply cannot. The existence of a fit and compatibility among clients and practices is the starting point for deciding whether national growth is the right choice.
Lawyers desiring national growth should know the exact details about the firm's strengths, its client focus, how profitable the firm is and what opportunities exist to get more work through national growth.
With this knowledge in place, there are five criteria that ultimately will determine whether a regional firm's effort to go national will be successful.
If your firm is fortunate enough to get a growing company or major celebrity onboard as a client (especially an entertainer with multiple personal legal issues or a sports star with a national presence), you can grow simply as their activities and the media attention do.
Consider these criteria before making the leap to the national stage. As the last several years have proven, no poorly run organization is too big to fail.
© 2024 Edward Poll & Associates, Inc. All rights reserved.