In the 1960s, the Beatles were all for peace and love — until they had to contend with Britain's then-draconian tax rates on the wealthy. The result was the nasty little song, "Taxman": "Be thankful I don't want it all ... /Don't ask me what I want it for/If you don't want to pay some more."
Many lawyers, of course, make a good living helping clients mitigate the impact of the taxman. But with states hard pressed for revenue, taxmen (and taxwomen) are trying to turn to an old revenue-raising staple: a tax on professional services, including those of lawyers.
To the best of my knowledge, Hawaii, New Mexico and South Dakota are the only states that collect sales tax on legal services. In recent decades, Massachusetts and Florida enacted sales taxes on services, but repealed them as unpopular and difficult to administer. States considering and rejecting service taxes include Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Vermont. But the issue is alive again in states from Georgia to Michigan.
In my home state of California, often the breeding ground of national trends, a service tax at the state's imposing 8.25 percent sales tax rate is being touted. The Los Angeles Times opined on the virtues of "focusing on a sales tax on lawyers and accountants, who presumably already have the number crunchers on staff to make sure the state gets its cut."
But a tax on legal services has strong specialized arguments against it. Here are just three:
Of course, it has also been argued that a legal services tax hurts people who need financial help for some of life's toughest problems: a spouse seeking child support; an injured worker seeking compensation; a person trying to protect his or her family through the drafting of a will.
But, as the taxman might say in such instances, "Be thankful I don't want it all ..."
© 2024 Edward Poll & Associates, Inc. All rights reserved.